IMPORTANT NOTICE
We are currently reviewing the content of the blog, but please note that any opinions expressed before the effective date of the acquisition are solely those of the original owner(s). We will not provide any comments or opinions on the previous content. You are welcome to post comments on the original posts, but we are not obligated to respond to your inquiries.
In this post, I am going to take a closer look at the impact of read-only routing on SQL Server Availability Groups performance.
I measured SQL Server Availability Groups (AG) performance before. And, a guy from Reddit recommended enabling read-only routing to achieve higher performance.
It is the second part of my research on SQL Server Availability Groups (AG) and SQL Server Failover Cluster Instances (FCI) performance. Before, I measured SQL Server AG performance on Storage Spaces. Today, I study the performance of SQL Server FCI on S2D, trying to prove that this thing can run 2 times faster than SQL Server AG on Storage Spaces.
In this article, I’d like to compare results of the previous two and find out whether SQL Failover Cluster Instance (FCI) can provide you two times higher performance than SQL Server Basic Availability Groups (BAG).
